VetraLens Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
JohnK007 wrote:
Not really.
The camera does indeed impress.
However, now that it's out there, I think it would be easier for Canon and Nikon (esp. Nikon) to build a high-end mirrorless competitor to this ... than it will be for Sony to build an entire super-telephoto lineup that can match Canon's or (esp.) Nikon's.
The current Sony super-telephoto lenses are over-priced duds, based on old Minolta specs, failing to match Canon super-teles, let alone Nikon's new lineup of FL ED series.
Ever since the Sigma/Tamron renaissance started (which was around the time the Alpha bodies became viable as pro tools), I've hoped Sony would hook up with one of the brands to license lens designs. I know Sony's got Zeiss on their team, but like you said, they need modern, competitively-priced lenses. Tamron's new 70-200 allegedly nips at the heels of both the Canon and Nikon versions, for half the price. Sigma's 120-300 f2.8 is, by most accounts, worthy of pro use. And of course, both Sigma and Tamron's new line of primes and even many zooms are all highly-praised.
If Sony teamed up with either brand and threw in some $$$ for R&D, I have no doubt that the joint venture could produce some of the finest lenses on the market at prices less than CaNikon. Plus, by working together, they'd avoid the single biggest problem with 3rd party lenses: autofocus inconsistencies. A set of Sigma Art lenses purpose-built to work with Sony Alpha cameras? That's a combo I'd get on board with.
|