dmward Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
Jay968 wrote:
dmward, what focal length was the 32-64 set at in that portrait? It looks pretty good and from what I have seen, the zoom is pretty much indistinguishable from the 63 f2.8 at the 64mm setting. How do you like the zoom at other focal lengths? Do you think it competes favorably with primes at all its focal lengths?
In your opinion, is there any reason to own both the zoom and the 63 (aside from the additional f-stop and smaller size of the 63)?
Jay, the portrait is actually a tight crop of a full length shot.
I didn't remember exactly and don't have the EXIF data handy at the moment but I expect that it was close to 32mm and F8.
I got the zoom. Didn't think I wanted the 63 since I've never been a big fan of standard field of view lenses.
So far, both the zoom and the 120 have been outstanding.
|