JohnDizzo15 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
DavidBM wrote:
For a long time I've meant to get one of these; they tend to be less trashed than used EF 2.8/300 lenses because the were made just before the move from FD to EF. And I don't mind MF for this kind of work (though on a monopod you could use TAP if the lens is mounted to the pod).
A great lens for our dogs, and a certain kind of people pic too. If Sony ever make an FE one I predict 6k
Anyhhw I was spurred into action by some nice images @Phillip Reeve@ posted (with the only slightly joking thought that if he reviews it used prices may spike for a bit)
I managed to get a clean copy of the nfd for US700...
So it, and adapters, won't arrive for a week....in the mean time any samples or discussion?
...Show more →
I actually almost pulled the trigger on one of these a bunch of different times a few years back but finally got a pretty clean copy of the EF version for 1100 about two years ago which I couldn't pass up since the FDs weren't far enough off that to convince me to go MF instead.
Images out of the FD in this thread look plenty good.
Not sure if anyone has done a comparison between the FD and EF version around here but it would be very interesting to hear some people's thoughts on IQ differences (hopefully I didn't miss it elsewhere in the thread if already done).
With regard to another question posed above, I prefer packing the Canon 55-250 STM for travel since it is super compact, weights next to nothing, and has solid performance albeit only covering APSC. I tend to throw it on the Fuji X-T30 with adapter and it ends up being a super light/compact way for me to get to 375mm.
I only use mine once a few times in the year so I don't have many super recent samples. Here's a few from a while back.
A9 + Canon 300/2.8 by Johndizzo15, on Flickr
A9 + Canon 300/2.8 by Johndizzo15, on Flickr
A9 + Canon 300/2.8 by Johndizzo15, on Flickr
A9 + Canon 300/2.8 by Johndizzo15, on Flickr
A9 + Canon 300/2.8 by Johndizzo15, on Flickr
|