Alpha_Geist Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
| p.2 #1 · p.2 #1 · Leica 90mm Elmarit 2.8 or Summarit 2.4 on M246? | |
rscheffler wrote:
Sorry, I missed this. But I see you got the Summarit already.
Yes, focus can be tricky, but practice helps. Honestly, I used the lens a lot at or near to infinity and stopped down a bit for urban and natural landscapes. I didn't use it much for people photos or detail shots, preferring 50mm for such applications.
I was never bothered by the build quality, which IMO is very similar to expensive Leica glass. Nor did the rubber focusing ring detract from the experience, for me. IMO, it's a nitpick detail that some like to complain about for some reason. In fact, I've had more reliability/build problems with Crons and Luxes than the Summarit, which was solid for the duration of my ownership.
As touched on briefly in the Leica images thread, watch your shutter speeds at 90mm. I've never had great luck with anything under 1/250. Sure, it's doable, but it requires greater care and multiple images.
Touching on what Adam mentioned, I briefly shot with the 75 Summarit and it is slightly better - sharper, contrast, less CA. But if you need/want 90, the Summarit is a good lens....Show more →
Thank you Ron for your follow up. My apologies for not responding sooner.
After spending a week with the 90mm Summarit, I can say that I am delightfully surprised. Sure, the focus throw is much smaller than the 90 pre asph, but the lens is smaller and a bit lighter. The rubber grip on the focusing barrel is quite good and doesn't feel at all sloppy. The lens is a joy to use. I haven't used it for portraits yet, but I'm very impressed with the environmental shots I've taken so far. I do agree that the rendering is modern compared to Mandler's pre-asph, but I'm liking it very much. I just received my m262 and will be trying this lens on a color camera as opposed to the monochrom. I should have a better idea of the color signature of this lens this weekend when I have some more "me" time.
|