DavidBM Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
carlitos wrote:
Apparently, the Batis 18 performs better than the previous Zeiss 18's, some of which were built in Germany. The difference being better computer processors and design algorithms; more automation and robotics in the manufacturing process (fewer human beings who tend to lose concentration); feedback loops that bring the process back into spec (tooling, machine wear) before too many samples go out of spec. The tighter the spec, the more products within spec, the more expensive it gets.
You could take the whole process and put it on the moon (one day), and say the lenses were built on the moon.
Cosina/Voigtlander & Zeiss provide a good business model. C-V builds some interesting lenses - the 35/1.2 Nokton, this new "C-V Nikon 58/1.4", et al. Not Zeiss branded, but worse? No, a different flavor....Show more →
The difference between cv and Zeiss branded lenses seems to be that Zeiss either sells you a classic design whose flaws are known and liked, or more usually else specs a lens whose performance is immaculate either by moderate specs (Batis Lox) or huge size and cost (Otus). CV on the other hand will usually nowadays design lenses with interesting specs (tiny superwides or small fast lenses or super fast lenses like 35 1.2 - but with the inevitable trade off in performance in some areas. Both approaches are good ones for certain purposes. Zeiss also gives you a serious repair network, which cv doesn't really.
|