Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              31      
32
       end
  

Archive 2016 · C-sonnar!

  
 
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.32 #1 · p.32 #1 · C-sonnar!


RustyBug wrote:
What would be your "runner up" to this lens ... one that doesn't have the focus shift issue?


Leica 50/1.4 Lux. Generally aspheric lenses correct focus shift effectively.



Oct 06, 2023 at 07:31 PM
RustyBug
Online
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.32 #2 · p.32 #2 · C-sonnar!


mahimihi wrote:
Why not go for the Voigtlander 50f1.5 Nokton II and avoid the focus shift problem?


Does it draw like the Sonnar?



Oct 06, 2023 at 08:15 PM
bjhurley
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.32 #3 · p.32 #3 · C-sonnar!


ocean2059 wrote:
[
I had my ZM Sonnar 50/1.5 recalibrated by DAG years ago. At the time, he gave me the choice of recalibrating it at either f/1.5 or at f/2.8. I was told that the lens was cerebrated at f/2.8 out of factory when purchased new. So I believe it can be done at f/2.8. At f/4, the focus shit may not have that big of an effect.


Back then they were calibrated at f/2.8 but then Cosina shifted to calibrating them at f2, which is where mine is.

I also have a dual-range Summicron, which doesn't have focus shift and is a nice lens, but doesn't have that Sonnar rendering plus it's a lot heavier than the C-Sonnar. I like 'em both.



Oct 07, 2023 at 12:31 AM
rscheffler
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.32 #4 · p.32 #4 · C-sonnar!


mahimihi wrote:
Why not go for the Voigtlander 50f1.5 Nokton II and avoid the focus shift problem?

RustyBug wrote:
Does it draw like the Sonnar?


I had the previous version 50/1.5 Nokton LTM and felt its rendering was quite close to the 50 Lux ASPH, which means not very Sonnar-like, IMO. I have a few 50mm Sonnar variants (Zeiss Opton, Nikkor 5cm/1.4, 7Artisans 50/1.1) and all have focus shift, which appears to be inherent in the design, likely due to SA.



Oct 07, 2023 at 02:52 AM
mahimihi
Offline

[X]
p.32 #5 · p.32 #5 · C-sonnar!


RustyBug wrote:
Does it draw like the Sonnar?


If you show me an example of the sonnar drawing something I can answer.

However it “draws” the focusing issues aren’t worth it. The Nokton “draws” nicely also and you can accurately focus it.

Edited on Oct 08, 2023 at 07:48 AM · View previous versions



Oct 08, 2023 at 07:41 AM
mahimihi
Offline

[X]
p.32 #6 · p.32 #6 · C-sonnar!




rscheffler wrote:
I had the previous version 50/1.5 Nokton LTM.


that’s not the lens I’m talking about.



Oct 08, 2023 at 07:42 AM
rscheffler
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.32 #7 · p.32 #7 · C-sonnar!


mahimihi wrote:
Why not go for the Voigtlander 50f1.5 Nokton II and avoid the focus shift problem?

RustyBug wrote:
Does it draw like the Sonnar?

rscheffler wrote:
I had the previous version 50/1.5 Nokton LTM.

mahimihi wrote:
that’s not the lens I’m talking about.


My bad. In my mind the LTM was the first version and the first M version after it, which was optically the same, was the second model. If you meant the current VM 50/1.5, Fred reviewed it and you can get a sense of its rendering character from his photos. IMO that one too is more similar to the 50 Lux ASPH than a Sonnar style rendering.



Oct 08, 2023 at 09:17 AM
RustyBug
Online
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.32 #8 · p.32 #8 · C-sonnar!


mahimihi wrote:
However it “draws” the focusing issues aren’t worth it.


Well ... it seems that there are some folks who think it IS worth it.


My question isn't the matter of an absolute "deal breaker" for whether or not the Sonnar 1.5 is "worth it" or not. The issue of "worth it" is as subjective for someone's temperament for spending the effort to contend with focus shift issues, as for someone's temperament for spending the money for an APO SUmmilux, or their temperament for toting a larger, heavier lens with more optical correction, as to whether or not it is "worth it". The opinion of whether or not it is "worth it" never was my question.

I'm just trying to understand how close it is vs. isn't to having a similar draw. I figure there's a sliding scale wrt to lens design regarding the way it draws vs. the way the focus shifts. Given the infinite range of lens designs (Sonnar, Planar, Double Gauss, Tessar, Petzal, etc.) through the elemental combinations of design, any two given lenses are going to have some degree of optical properties of similarities and differences.

There are certain aspects of optics that can be diametrically opposed in a quid pro quo kind of way. The matter of draw and focus shift seem to have a certain interdependence for some lenses and lens design approaches. What is being "traded away" in the draw, in order to achieve a lens with absolutely no focus shift, may not be "worth it" to trade away that much of the draw. So, it's my goal to understand what the draw variance vs. focus shift variance is between the Sonnar and the Voigt you've recommended for consideration ... i.e. I'm considering your recommendation, so I'd like to understand more of it (thus the question). From which I'll make my own assessment of whether or not (either) the lens is "worth it" or not. Worth ... is entirely subjective. Optical properties are much more technically objective. Whether or not those technical objectives are desirable or not ... back to highly subjective, and relative to both temperament and application.

So, my question remains ... does it draw like the Sonnar?



Oct 08, 2023 at 09:40 AM
mahimihi
Offline

[X]
p.32 #9 · p.32 #9 · C-sonnar!



RustyBug wrote:
Well ... it seems that there are some folks who think it IS worth it.

My question isn't the matter of an absolute "deal breaker" for whether or not the Sonnar 1.5 is "worth it" or not. The issue of "worth it" is as subjective for someone's temperament for spending the effort to contend with focus shift issues, as for someone's temperament for spending the money for an APO SUmmilux, or their temperament for toting a larger, heavier lens with more optical correction, as to whether or not it is "worth it". The opinion of whether or not it is
...Show more

Some people love the lens. But most of the posts are complaining about the bad focus shift.

If that’s an issue then get the Nokton. Has no focus shift issues. If you shoot en EVF camera then it makes no difference.

I don’t know what you mean by draw. I don’t think 2 different lenses will produce the exact same image. No.



Oct 08, 2023 at 03:02 PM
nehemiahphoto
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.32 #10 · p.32 #10 · C-sonnar!


Here is an awesome review, and spectacular set of images with this lens. Perspectives like this, with actual images are a good counter balance.

https://gear.vogelius.se/-reviews/zeiss-zm-50-sonnar/index.html



Oct 08, 2023 at 04:05 PM
Tim Zhou
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.32 #11 · p.32 #11 · C-sonnar!


Two recent shots from my travel in Vietnam

http://_DSC6853-Edit by T Zhou, on Flickr


_DSC6663-Edit by T Zhou, on Flickr



Oct 09, 2023 at 02:19 PM
Tim Zhou
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.32 #12 · p.32 #12 · C-sonnar!


Two more portrait shots
Sony A7II + Zeiss 50mm f1.5 ZM

_DSC7530-Edit by T Zhou, on Flickr




_DSC6388-Edit by T Zhou, on Flickr



Oct 13, 2023 at 01:10 PM
j.scooter
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.32 #13 · p.32 #13 · C-sonnar!


There is so much talk about focus shift in this thread. I shot this lens exclusively(almost) everyday with a M3 for a year.

If it is allowed, here is a link to the tumblr I made for it:https://www.tumblr.com/blog/chasingphotons-365project

I am not saying that there isn't focus shift. I am saying that I never thought about it, never accounted for it when shooting and never had to throw away a shot because of it.

Maybe I am not picky, maybe it is because I am shooting film and scanning and occasionally printing. Admittedly, I only used wider apertures in low light, but for me, the talk of focus shift overshadows, the gem of a lens this is.



Oct 14, 2023 at 04:43 PM
Tim Zhou
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.32 #14 · p.32 #14 · C-sonnar!


That is also why I shared some recent photos to counter balance the argument against this lens. I bought the lens based on this very thread. The sample photos, tests and discussions from Fred, David and many others convinced me.
The interesting thing on the forum is that the most vociferous critics tend to be those who lack first-hand experience with the equipment. but I suppose that is internet.



Oct 15, 2023 at 06:47 AM
Hardcore
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.32 #15 · p.32 #15 · C-sonnar!


Just picked up this lens to use with the Nikon ZF.


Oct 25, 2023 at 09:41 AM
Hardcore
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.32 #16 · p.32 #16 · C-sonnar!


Just got the lens today. Love the rendering. Both at F1.5. Smaller than I thought it was going to be but handles well on the ZF.

Just me and pup at home today!
















Edited on Nov 08, 2023 at 12:17 PM · View previous versions



Nov 06, 2023 at 01:57 PM
Desmolicious
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.32 #17 · p.32 #17 · C-sonnar!


one advantage of adapting this lens is you can focus closer than on a native M body.


Nov 06, 2023 at 03:10 PM
Hardcore
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.32 #18 · p.32 #18 · C-sonnar!


This thread ended up being archived.... 2 more with the C-sonnar & ZF












Dec 29, 2023 at 05:11 PM
1       2       3              31      
32
       end




FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              31      
32
       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username       Or Reset password



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.