Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
Steve Spencer wrote:
Yeah, the Loxia certainly is stronger midfield at f/5.6, and I suspect f/8. The Loxia for me would win by a hair and make it worth having for landscape use especially when you consider the size difference and the possibility of having to walk a ways to get to your landscape shoot, but you wouldn't lose much by shooting with the FE 50 f/1.4 ZA. That mid zone dip is consistent with the MTFs from lens rentals as well, so I suspect it will hold up across copies of the lens even if it isn't extreme.
Personally, I like to keep one set of lenses with fast apertures and a parallel set with slower apertures, smaller size, and excellent performers stopped down for landscape. I think the FE 50 f/1.4 ZA and the Loxia 50 f/2 make a great pair in that way. The GM 85 f/1.4 and the Zeiss ZM 85 f/4 would also make a great pair....Show more →
Yes, the Loxia 50/2 is stronger at mid-field even when comparing to the 55/1.8. It also has more micro-contrast which I find it a plus for landscapes.
Couldn't agree more with the 50/1.4ZA + L50/2 and 85/1.4GM + 85/4ZM sets. Different lenses for different purposes.
However, for portraits at ~50mm, one may also consider the 55/1.8 or 50/1.5C Sonnars.
|