JimFox Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Aztatlan wrote:
Thanks everyone!
#1 is a composite, shot at 28mm with the moon shot at 200mm. The moon was there, setting behind Fitz Roy, however was obviously rendered very small at 28mm.
---------------------------------------------
Yep. 200mm.
---------------------------------------------
I spent some time trying to get the size of the moon 'right'. Part of that was visualizing in my head while on-scene how large it was in proportion to the mountain; although the size of it as-is may not be to everyone's taste, I feel it is about right for how I saw it and remember it on the day in question. It's actually been decreased in size significantly (about 30%) versus my first edit of this shot. How big to leave it was a point I debated for a while.
The conditions we had were pretty good yeah. Had 3-4 days of great light in TDP, on the Argentinian side we were a bit less fortunate I think; the sunrise at Cerro Torre never really delivered to it's full potential and burned out quickly, and most of the other shoots had little to no cloud around Fitz Roy. But at least it wasn't raining or windy 
...Show more →
When it comes to things like moons in shots, we (photographers) wil be the toughest critics. For the average person they will just love #1 I believe.
Jim
|