tsdevine Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
Thanks Tariq, looking at the f/11 shots it seems like the 28 holds it's own....at least considering it's a lens made in the mid 70's. Can't argue with the quality of the 31 though.
I think I can keep temptation at bay. Considering that the 28 is noticeably wider, and it's like roulette when you buy these lenses....you never know if you're going to get a dud or a rock star. (And I only paid $85 for my 28.)
Also, my FE 16-35 has more of a flat field at 28....so it would be good at infinity shots with everything in the frame at a large distance (which I don't shoot much being an East coaster.)
The 28/3.5 has the DoF to cover most of what I normally shoot, something that I can't say about a lot of the other 28's I've tested.
Bottom line is that both lenses look like winners for landscape shooting.
-Tim
Tariq Gibran wrote:
I did another comparative test today using a different adapter with the 28/3.5K. I do believe it made a positive difference. Particularly for medium to close distances like you shoot, that Pentax 28 is damn good. Here again in this scene, the 28 offers an extended foreground dof/ sharpness compared to the 31, particularly noticeable in the f5.6 and F8 shots. Focus point for both lenses was the center small tree in the medium distance zone (image center). I also believe I'm seeing that the 31 may somehow be showing diffraction effects at F11 more so than the 28. As for the 31, it does offer sharper side borders at F5.6 and F8 and if one looks at the smaller distant objects, they are sharper with the 31. I think the 31 pretty much peaks by F8 and the 28 at F11 (which works out nicely given it seems to somehow be more resistant to diffraction effects).
For these images as with the previous bunch, I did no additional sharpening (beyond default) or clarity enhancements in ACR.
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7433/16206785457_f288f1f8ee_b.jpgPK28F8 by tariqgibranstudio, on Flickr
Link for 28 Album:
https://flic.kr/s/aHsk7kGUBz
Link for 31 Album:
https://flic.kr/s/aHsk7mdLqU...Show more →
|