tele_pathic Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Ok, so I came up with some criteria:
1. Bokeh: Ok, so I know the bokeh will be different for each lenses at a given aperture. The images on the 85 at 1.8 for portraits, I don't really care for. The images on the 70-200 at f4, I like at least as much as the 85 at f4 or 5.6.
2. Compression and Field of view: I forgot to test these or pay much attention to it over the weekend, so I'll have to give it another go.
3. Colors, including rendering: I love the colors of both
4. Vignetting: apparent on the 85 at 1.8 but gone by f4, 5.6. No vignetting on 70-200 at f4
5. Distortion: none in either lens, as one would expect.
6. Non-tangibles: I like the IDEA of having the 85mm, but I have the 50mm 1.4 which I use as my walk-around lens. I was REALLY impressed with the 70-200 for portrait shots. And while I can see the value of keeping the 85mm, I have to say, given my shoe string budget at the moment, I could use the $250 elsewhere for shizzle (a 2nd and 3rd flash + gels to enhance my studio work, which would help land a particular client [cheerleader T&I photos], which would pay for an upgrade to a 5diii!!!). In fact, of my favorite photos from my shooting this week, they were ALL the 70-200, not the 85mm.
So I'll think on it for the week, shoot a few in order to gauge compression and field of view, and try to make a decision this weekend. I know it seems nearly blasphemous to mention selling the 85mm, but at this point in my business building, the extra flashes and gels would help increase my business more than the 85mm would. Does that make sense?
|