I promise this was shot with the 58. Did a ghetto negative scan with my d750 and 35 siggy. The photo is out of focus and there are dust and paw prints on the negative. Skin lacks tonal quality yet I still love the capture.
In my opinion, the best trio on the "wider" end, as opposed to 24/50/85. The only thing I wish tho, is for 35G to have Nano coating... I will put it to test against flare and see what kind of a difference it will make against my 20mm f/1.8G
Love this lens so much. I have several shoots coming up in the next few weeks and honestly can't see myself using the 85/1.4 very much. Thinking about swapping it out for a 135 for extra reach/separation from the 58, but I can't make up my mind on that
Wow!
Michael how do you compare 3D and bokeh to the Summilux-R 80?
After purchasing a Df and converting to F mount my Leica R lenses... I felt in love me too with this camera
lithos wrote:
Wow!
Michael how do you compare 3D and bokeh to the Summilux-R 80?
After purchasing a Df and converting to F mount my Leica R lenses... I felt in love me too with this camera
I don't see 3D for both lens, but Bokeh is gorgeous for both.
These are some flower test shots. This is mainly answer my own question about this lens.
