Tariq Gibran Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
mawz wrote:
No the either/or now is in terms of size/weight of gear. Aside from those few willing to go Leica with the associated compromises in capability, your choice is to haul a large & heavy DSLR setup, or give up a small amount of IQ and go to a compact mirrorless system like the X, NEX or m43. The latter option makes getting the shot easier as well (easier to get the gear to the site, more accurate AF, if slower in some cases, much easier to carry all necessary lenses)
At my print sizes, the IQ difference between a NEX-7 or OM-D and a D800E are small, and often invisible. On screen, the differences are invisible when viewing the full image. And of course there's far less difference between an OM-D and a 5DIII, A99 or D600 in IQ terms than there is between those mirrorless cameras and a D800E.
Small format (which 35mm traditionally is) has always been about giving up some IQ to get a massive increase in portability. That's why Oskar Barnack invented the Ur-Leica. Modern Mirrorless cameras are solidly in that tradition, while modern FF DSLR's are Medium Format equivalents in terms of size, weight and portability. Yeah, use the DSLR when you have to. But you are giving up nearly nothing by going to Mirrorless outside of edge cases where the DSLR has a big advantage (generally these come down to long lens work, continuous AF, shallow DoF and high ISO, also very large prints in the case of the D800's, but not the other current FF bodies)...Show more →
This remark was about jpeg vs raw. In any case, the equipment in question (Fuji XE-1), as well as everything you have mentioned, is obviously very capable when not crippled by the user.
|