This monitor can show a 33GP image without resizing but is not in production and has no available video content other than made for demo purposes. But maybe the more important news is how many 4 K monitors were shown at the show.
ben egbert wrote:
I am only interested in affordable monitors to replace my 6 year old NEC 26090. Maybe in another 4-5 years. A 30 inch 4K would be really nice.
Exactly. They can keep their 8K .and their 4K TV's - they're only any use if you're a gangster/ footballer/NBA star living in a mansion.
I'm with you Ben; first give me a monitor that can display my 25MB files at their native resolution.
Paul Mo wrote:
Exactly. They can keep their 8K .and their 4K TV's - they're only any use if you're a gangster/ footballer/NBA star living in a mansion.
I'm with you Ben; first give me a monitor that can display my 25MB files at their native resolution.
My 1920x1200 monitor displays as nice as a 16x24 print, I can only imagine what a 4k monitor will look like, I bet it would induce me to upgrade printers.
I don't like the low pixel density on the current monitors. I want something big-ish (say 27" or maybe just 24") with at least 130 ppi and of course excellent colour and tonal uniformity (NEC, EIZO, etc). And not 16:9 ratio.
Alan321 wrote:
I don't like the low pixel density on the current monitors. I want something big-ish (say 27" or maybe just 24") with at least 130 ppi and of course excellent colour and tonal uniformity (NEC, EIZO, etc). And not 16:9 ratio.
I'm with you, but it doesn't exist yet. Retina has aced the pixel density, but not the size (15" diag) or ratio (1.6:1). I compromised this evening and ordered the Eizo SX2762W: 27", 16:9, 109ppi. Should be fun using it side-by-side with my MacBook.
