It seems the conditions (seeing, shot execution and ISS angle relative to the sun) weren't as optimal as April last year, when I got a bit better detail.
p.1 #17 · Trying to capture detail from over 400 km away
Thanks everyone for the comments!
PetKal wrote:
That doesn't seem to matter, Romy, you do get spectacular shots with your MkI.
Peter, having used both versions of the 400 2.8 IS, how would you compare the optics of the new vs the old? My old one is so unbelievably sharp that I see an increase in captured detail at moonshots up to a 4x TC. I'm curious if Canon was able to improve on the near optical perfection of the older one.