These two local schools always seem to battle for the State Championship in volleyball. County was the state champ in 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007. Valley won in 2004, 2002, 2001.
Last night they met up in the Regional Quarterfinal. My neighbor's daughter is on the team, so I though I'd try VB one more time.
It's always a humbling experience. Still has to be my most challenging sport to capture... crowded court, fast action, tons of obstructions, limited shooting positions, the players always seem to be facing the wrong direction, AF always seems to lock onto the net, and of course, dim lighting.
This gym has an elevated platform in one corner. For giggles, I brought my 600/4L and tried a few shots, but it wasn't high enough to give a view of the opposite court over the net. I got a few shots, but did better switching to the 200/1.8L with 1.x4 TC. After the first set, I moved down to my usual spot... sitting on the floor next to the scorer's table with just a 85/1.8 (although I did try the 200/1.8 from the floor too).
Nice job with all the digs. You've really got those dialed in. The setter shot is nice too! The problem with high school hitters is they don't get over the net. Even shooting it's hard to get a good face shot. All in all I would say it's a good day of shooting though. Thanks for posting.
Some really great bumping shots here! Hitting is always a challenge... You have to have good positioning, that position has to be available, and then you have to have a good hitter, and she has to get set well... So many variables!
This is a fine set that you should be proud of, and I am sure parents will be happy too.
You did good with this set of pics. Very nice capture of the action. Agree with shooting vb is one of the toughest to do. I take about 500 shots during a hs game and come out with about 90-100 usable ones.
Fish On wrote:
I take about 500 shots during a hs game and come out with about 90-100 usable ones.
Yep, keeper rate was pretty low. I took over 600 shots and ended up with 266 keepers for MP.
rolette wrote:
#1 - I'd probably ditch this one. Really need to be up higher for that shot. Too much tape across her face (well, chin/neck). Horizon is off.
#4 - Delete. Same reasons as #1
Thanks Jay. I agree. I was hoping to get an angle like these pictures of yours:
Clarence. This is a question that I have for all your posts, not just this one. How do you pp your images? The reason that I ask is that they are always consistent, but on my monitor, your images often look a bit washed out...like the richness is gone. When you export, do you do us sRGB?
Jeff_Stapleton wrote:
Clarence. This is a question that I have for all your posts, not just this one. How do you pp your images? The reason that I ask is that they are always consistent, but on my monitor, your images often look a bit washed out...like the richness is gone. When you export, do you do us sRGB?
Interesting. I shoot in RAW sRGB and import into LR4. Minimal processing... usually just cropping to the MP aspect... a little looser than most people like, but the intent is to provide a universal aspect that can be cropped to 4x6 to 8x10. Straighten horizons (although I probably miss 25%). Minimal sharpening. If ISO is above 3200, I use 25% NR.
No presets, no saturation boosts, no contrast, no tone curves.
Jeff_Stapleton wrote:
How do you pp your images? The reason that I ask is that they are always consistent, but on my monitor, your images often look a bit washed out...like the richness is gone.
I think you might be onto something, Jeff.
I don't know LR well enough to know how to mitigate this yet (ideally I'd like to optimize the exposure settings in-camera too), but I went through the set and checked out the histograms.
See where I scribbled in the far right side of the histograms? I see the spike for the white walls, but then the curve drops off and I have a quarter-inch of wasted dynamic range that isn't being used. If I drag the curve to match the histogram, I get more punch on the high-end.
But how do I do this in-camera? If I bump up the exposure, I'd clip the whites at the top of the histogram spike.
When I set manual exposure in a gym, I typically just set SS and aperture where I want them, then increase ISO until I start getting over-exposure blinkies on the viewfinder LCD.
Does anyone have any best-practices on their basic LR PP steps? Especially for histograms and curves.
My rule of thumb is not to spend more than a minute on a picture. After I culled, I had 266 pictures from this game. Even at a minute per picture, that's 4 hours of PP in LR... import, sync AR, sharpening and NR. Then eyeball each picture to crop tighter and straighten horizons. Then export. I don't want to add a manual step to each picture, but if I could improve something in-camera or in the batch sync, I'd love to hear some tips.
And Clarence, I'm not trying to dog you or say you're doing anything wrong. I almost sent you this in a PM, but I thought others might have noticed as well. Your pictures are consistently well captured, well cropped, etc.
I notice this in both indoor and outdoor images from you. Day and night images. It just seems that the colors aren't as rich as I expect. I may be alone in seeing this. If so, please disregard .
Maybe it's Nikon magic... maybe just better skill with balancing exposures, but I'd love to know if it's something that I could improve in post-processing. Maybe it's just a mix of bodies and lenses... I know my 5D and 5D2 always had richer colors than my 1D3 and 1D4. And the 80-200/2.8L MDP seems much richer than my other lenses.
I think I like the extra detail in the skin tones. My other attempts ended up too splotchy, feverish. Big difference between "rich" and over-saturated or artificially vibrant.
Clarence, I'd like to hear some others weigh in before you commit to a redesign of your workflow. I'm actually a bit surprised nobody else has chimed in to the affirmative or the negative of this observation.
Yeah, until I learn proper technique on how to improve richness in-camera or in post-processing, I'm not going to keep hacking in LR. After a while it gets too hard to tell if you're making improvements or just trying to polish a turd. Admittedly, I prefer a neutral image... I'm not one for hyper-saturation or over-the-top post-processing. And maybe it's just from being in a 58-year-old gym. But I'm concerned because you noted the same problems with all of my outdoor shots too.
The VB semifinals were last night, so I went back to the same gym and used a little lower exposure... still 1D Mk4, M, 85mm, ISO 3200, WB=3300, but this time I bumped the SS from 1/1000" to 1/1250" to see if they look less washed out.
These pictures aren't really noteworth for action. They certainly don't warrant a separate thread. So I'll just add them here. At this point I'm more interested in hearing tips for post-processing...
.