uz2work Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Pixel Perfect wrote:
Well compared to a 1Ds III, it pretty much blows it away. 3MP in res is nothing. If this is not worth $6800, then 1Ds III is not worth $5800, but is still $7K and was $8K. So it's better value than it could have been seeing US dollar is in the toilet. But it's a bitter pill for those that have been the 1D non s series, as it's a 40% price increase on an already expensive camera.
I agree that, if I had to make a choice between buying a 1Ds Mark III and a 1D X for the same price, my choice would easily be to buy the 1D X. I agree that 3 mp is negligible, and the other improvements in the 1D X would be very compelling. On the other hand, if I already had a 1Ds Mark III, I'm not sure that I could make a case for why it would make sense to sell the 1Ds Mark III, add a few thousand dollars, and buy a 1D X. As I've said in another post, the 1D X would seem to be a worthy upgrade for owners of 1Ds Mark II and other older bodies, but I'm not convinced that the same thing is true for those who already have a 1Ds Mark III.
Les
|