Navyblue 
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
|
Doesn't it looks perfect?
Rule of thirds is not about putting subjects along the lines.
May I quote the link that you gave me.
Analogous to this "Rule of thirds", (if I may be allowed so to call it) I have presumed to think that, in connecting or in breaking the various lines of a picture, it would likewise be a good rule to do it, in general, by a similar scheme of proportion;
The lines acts as zone delineation. If you have a subject along the line, the subject acts as a zone divider. But subject is not the only thing that can create delineation. s stated in bold, it is the about lines in a picture, and more elabrated below in bold.
In short, in applying this invention, generally speaking, or to any other case, whether of light, shade, form, or color, I have found the ratio of about two thirds to one third, or of one to two, a much better and more harmonizing proportion, than the precise formal half, the two-far-extending four-fifths—and, in short, than any other proportion whatever.
Using the example above, the ratio between the empty space at the top and the subject is 1:2. Man it deosn't get any more textbook than this.  If you like a more classic landscape example, visualise the subject below as land, the empty space above as sky. The horizon falls exactly on the top horizontal line, eventhough horizon is not exactly a "thing", it is a border or zone lines.
The space (or if you like the terminology above, shade, or black) between the valves runs along the vertical lines and separating the picture into 3 equal vertical parts. Again, if you like a classic landscape example, visualise the valves as mountains and the space in between as valleys. The valleys runs along the vertical lines, eventhough valley is not exactly a "thing", it is a border or zone lines.
|
