Are you really that upset its not a true supermodel ? Could you not easily find that on the net in the time it took you to post you complain message ?
I don't know if its the market tanking or what, but its like people are just getting more and more uptight and lacking any sense of humor.
I personally found it a funny thread idea and setup, and a photo I surely would of snapped had I walked by as well.
Sometimes a little change of pace from obsessing over Zeiss glass, corner performance and CA, dynamic range and actually snapping a real photo is good for ya
Cuz she's fat, ugly, and old. She's not in interesting or designer cloths, and she's (at least portraying) homelessness. EVERYTHING on the opposite side of what we associate with a "super-model"! FPF said it graciously enough: Title is misleading!
I think it's an interesting photograph and an interesting title-play for those very same reasons tho! Nice!
And, yes I read that sign. -- Maybe she means the dog? Or maybe she's watching the dog till her super-model daughter get's back?
Bifurcator wrote:
Cuz she's fat, ugly, and old. She's not in interesting or designer cloths, and she's (at least portraying) homelessness. EVERYTHING on the opposite side of what we associate with a "super-model"!
Sounds like you guys came for porn, didn't get it, whined about it
plastic_lens wrote:
Why so many images of homeless people? Does it help them at all?
Actually it does from people like me. I see a lot of these people regularly and I can definitely tell who is home less or not. Some I see at 6AM dragging their blanket on the grounds, some I see just digging in a garbage can for food and some are just pretending or have nothing better to do than beg for money.
I engage with a lot of these people and after I am done snapping a few shots I end up giving them a couple of bucks or in some cases some food.
-- Maybe she means the dog? Or maybe she's watching the dog till her super-model daughter get's back? 
