 |
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
|
|
Review Date: Mar 4, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $300.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Cost, quality of photos
|
|
Cons:
|
None discovered
|
|
|
This lense and my 85 f1.8 are used more than my L-zooms. Perhaps when I progress to more L primes I will notice some faults posted by other users, so far this and the 85 rule.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Jun 16, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,050.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Incedible Images, not too heavy, works well with 1.4 TC
|
|
Cons:
|
A bit expensive
|
|
|
I have already captured some incedible shots, only shooting small wild life in northern NJ. Works great with the converter.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
|
|
Review Date: Jun 16, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $550.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Light, great pictures, mine works fine with 1.4 TC
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
Great lens for the money. I liked this lens so much I am upgrading to the f2.8. Only weakness is low light shooting.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
|
|
Review Date: May 12, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $300.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharpness is outstanding. Low light is not a problem.
|
|
Cons:
|
Sometimes I I have to step back, just kidding, no negatives from me yet.
|
|
|
This lens is so sharp that when I take a picture I sometimes see things that I do not like in a shot(facial hair, and you know what else).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
