Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM
|
|
Review Date: Apr 22, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
My copy is very, very sharp even wide open. Great improvement.wonderful lens!
|
|
Cons:
|
None for the moment unless vigetting wide open.
|
|
|
Sharper than my canon 24/70 2.8 at 24mm.
No distortion.
No CA
Nice colors
Good contrast
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM
|
|
Review Date: Mar 15, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
very sharp, great colours, good correction of distortion
|
|
Cons:
|
price
|
|
|
Very expensive but you get the quality you have paied for!
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
|
|
Review Date: Jan 11, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
21MP, improved ISO, great LCD, Great IQ
|
|
Cons:
|
Dots but i didn't found them!
|
|
|
Great improvement for my old 5D. Everything is better! Why ask for a different camera? Body is not 1 series but I don't want it heavier!
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Apr 18, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,197.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
2.8, fast focus, sharp, sharp, sharp!
|
|
Cons:
|
Price
|
|
|
Expensive but you get paied by quality! I don't regret.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Apr 18, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,197.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
2.8, fast focus, sharp, sharp, sharp!
|
|
Cons:
|
Price
|
|
|
Expensive but you get paied by quality! I don't regret.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 5D
|
|
Review Date: Apr 15, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $2,700.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Image quality, high ISO performance, build quality
|
|
Cons:
|
No automatic cleaning of sensor
|
|
|
I have it for one month now. I love this camera - pictures are so natural as in old times! Try it!
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 11, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
built like a tank, very sharp, nice colors
|
|
Cons:
|
expensive
|
|
|
I am very glad and I can see it is much sharper than my 17-85
|
|
|
|
|