 |
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Sep 25, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Range, sharp, colours, image stabilzer, hand held
|
|
Cons:
|
NONE
|
|
|
Coming from a 50- 500mm
i could'nt believe what i was missing out! the sharpness was incredible and the colours were much better.
and the best thing is 95 per cent of shots i are perfct compared to my bigma where only 50 per cent of " HANDHELD" shots i could use
This is a must have lense, the range is incredible also.
you wont be dissapointed.
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 50-500mm f4-6.3 EX APO RF HSM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 22, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Great colours, love the range, possible handheld shop, sharp images before 450mm
|
|
Cons:
|
heavy
|
|
|
for what you pay this lense is incredible. yes hand held shots are difficult due to the weight but still possible at zoom under 400mm and when placed on a tripod or even leaned on your window the shots are sharp.
dont compare it to the canon 100 to 400 because the canon is better.
but for value for money, this lense will not dissapoint in good light as i find the sweet spot is f8 ss at 1/1000 in good light,
but you need to around with aperture and ss to get the bet out of the zoom. i just recently went to the kruger national park and i got incredible shot with this lense.
yes a IS would be nice but then the price wouldnt be nice.
this is a great lense i highly recomend it if the canon L lense is just to expensive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
