 |
Sigma 85mm F1.4 EX DG HSM
|
|
Review Date: Nov 3, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Good build quality, excellent sharpness, colour and contrast. Much lighter than the Canon!
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
I've had mine for nearly a year, and used it all through the wedding season on my 5d classics with great results. I don't use it wider than F2, but even at this apperture you can get fantastic 3d type images. The colour and sharpness always makes me smile.
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 50mm f2.8 EX Macro 1:1 Lens
|
|
Review Date: Oct 7, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Excellent image quality, very sharp, well built
|
|
Cons:
|
noisy af.
|
|
|
I bought this for a job to photograph food for a new restaurant and I have been amazed at the quality of the pictures. Sharp at f2.8 and even more so past f3.5. The 1:1 aspect is great, although a tripod is needed for best results once you get really close. Overall a great lens to get into macro photography.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Mar 27, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,000.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
focal range, IS, Sharp, well balanced - did I mention sharp?
|
|
Cons:
|
no hood
|
|
|
I've had this lens for a month and used it for portraits, landscapes and a lot of indoor work. Yesterday I had to photograph children rehearsing for and Easter service in a 300 year old church. The light was poor in the extreme, but this lens was brilliant. Hand held shots down to 1/10th are pin sharp. This lens is perfect on my 30d. Just get one!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
