 |
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM
|
|
Review Date: Dec 11, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 5
|
|
Pros:
|
Cheap, Ok for average snapshot
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow, Slow focusing, Tripod realistically required much of the time above 200mm
|
|
|
I have had this lens for several years and admit its my least used lens. However I have managed to get some decent shots although the CA, lack of contrast and slow AF have not been benficaial. If you are after a cheep second lens whist just starting consider this but also look at sigma and tamron.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 19, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Image Quality, Build, AF speed, sharpness
|
|
Cons:
|
Would love it to be faster but would be much more expensive
|
|
|
I am very happy with this lens, It replaced my 18-55 EF-S. Much better constructed and sharper but then 10x cost.
But I can use it on my 50E giving an ultra wide angle.
Love it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |