 |
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM A1
|
|
Review Date: Dec 10, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $900.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, High build quality, hood engages very nice, cap is awesome, fast, fast, and fast!!!
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
I love this lens, its sharp, and fast, wide open it is def. sharper than the other brand, the bokeh I would rate as a 9.5 out of 10 and I am fine with that.
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED VR AF
|
|
Review Date: May 7, 2012
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
|
|
Pros:
|
Nothing
|
|
Cons:
|
Pure garbage
|
|
|
Overpriced for a zoom lens, the VR works like crap and mine was very slow to focus and by the time it did the subject was long gone
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S Nikkor
|
|
Review Date: Jan 16, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
quiet and sharp at 2f
|
|
Cons:
|
soft wide open, not what I expected, but focal length is pretty good
|
|
|
decent lens, I would think the 1.8 does the same, but cheaper
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 22, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,049.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Light, fast-focus, IS, High quality plastic, Quiet
|
|
Cons:
|
Price, No tripod ring
|
|
|
Good performer, in terms of IQ the very same as the 100 2.8 version. Handhold ability is very good in good lighting. Build quality although mostly a plastic body, the feel and quality is very good. A light weight lens with excellent results. This is a great lens for people who don't use a tripod, although it can be used with a tripod like I use also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
