Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 26, 2005
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Price, optically better than the old 75-300 USM
|
|
Cons:
|
Build, no full time manual focus, size
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Apr 11, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,000.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Compact, IS, range, sharp
|
|
Cons:
|
Price
|
|
|
I have no idea about what people are complaining about this len. Maybe I am just luck to have a good copy, but I am not the only one. This lens produces sharp pictures most of the time and the IS really works.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM
|
|
Review Date: Jan 30, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $800.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
|
The greatest wide angle lens ever!!
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
|
|
Review Date: Dec 13, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $90.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
f1.4, sharp
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
The reason I decide to get this lens for my 20D is because I have a similiar FD lens for my AE-1 Program and I find it for portrait.
This is great portrait lens especially with 1.6x field of view crop.
|
|
|
|
|
Tokina 24-200mm AT-X 242 AF
|
|
Review Date: Dec 13, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality, zoom range, sharp most of time, fast AF
|
|
Cons:
|
None noticed
|
|
|
Just got this lens a couple of days ago. I have already taken almost 700 pictures with this lens. I am totaly happy with it.
It is the best suitable for out door usages, but I have managed to use it indoors with some good results as well.
|
|
|
|
|
