about | support

  Reviews by: hcoo  

View profile View recent posts View reviews Add hcoo to your Buddy List
Sigma 24-70mm f3.5-5.6 Aspherical HF

Review Date: Jan 8, 2006 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $150.00 | Rating: 8 

Pros: Cheap; better than kit lens; range; hood; weight

Good lens, its cheap and useful range. Good for general photography. Looks good with hood on. Im very satisfy with the quality of the lens for its category.

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Review Date: Jan 1, 2006 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $700.00 | Rating: 10 

Pros: IS, range... Sharp
none so far

I've been waiting for this lens to come out, comparing it to 70-200 4L; I choose this one for extra reach and for the IS... i nver regret chosing this lens, it s sharp and good in low light condition... Highly recommended...

Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM

Review Date: Jul 20, 2005 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $393.00 | Rating: 9 

Pros: Smooth; 1.8; solid built

Great for low light! I love to bring this lense during concerts;

Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 EX Aspherical DG DF

Review Date: Jul 20, 2005 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $540.00 | Rating: 8 

Pros: Big Apperture; Sharp; Usefull lense;
Heavy; stif zoom ring; complicated controls for manual focus; AF-hunt sometimes;

Good Lense; I already sold mine-I upgrade to 17-40mm 4L; This Lense is very useful and this is my walk around lense but its heavy... nice and sharp. Good in Low light conditions. F u can't afford "L" lense, this is a better alternative... w/c cost lesser.