Sigma 24-70mm f3.5-5.6 Aspherical HF
|
|
Review Date: Jan 8, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $150.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Cheap; better than kit lens; range; hood; weight
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
Good lens, its cheap and useful range. Good for general photography. Looks good with hood on. Im very satisfy with the quality of the lens for its category.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Jan 1, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $700.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
IS, range... Sharp
|
|
Cons:
|
none so far
|
|
|
I've been waiting for this lens to come out, comparing it to 70-200 4L; I choose this one for extra reach and for the IS... i nver regret chosing this lens, it s sharp and good in low light condition... Highly recommended...
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 20, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $393.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Smooth; 1.8; solid built
|
|
Cons:
|
LOng...
|
|
|
Great for low light! I love to bring this lense during concerts;
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 EX Aspherical DG DF
|
|
Review Date: Jul 20, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $540.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Big Apperture; Sharp; Usefull lense;
|
|
Cons:
|
Heavy; stif zoom ring; complicated controls for manual focus; AF-hunt sometimes;
|
|
|
Good Lense; I already sold mine-I upgrade to 17-40mm 4L; This Lense is very useful and this is my walk around lense but its heavy... nice and sharp. Good in Low light conditions. F u can't afford "L" lense, this is a better alternative... w/c cost lesser.
|
|
|
|
|
