Photoshop actions

  Reviews by: fauxtoman  

View profile View recent posts View reviews Add fauxtoman to your Buddy List
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Review Date: Apr 5, 2008 Recommend? yes | Price paid: Not Indicated | Rating: 5 

I realize this is the review page, however, I am very disturbed whenever I read any review of an L lens where someone bought a bad copy or in the case of one recent reviewer, two bads before finally getting a good one. I wrote to Canon about this since any L lens is relatively expensive and considered professional and that I expect it to come out of the box, perfect and ready to shoot. Here is the response I received from Canon. Please note, various things can happen to a lens from the time it is manufactured, and the time it reaches a dealer or customer that may require the lens to have some minor adjustments made to obtain full performance. In our newer camera models, there is a new feature called AF Microadjustment. This allows you to make fine adjustments of the AF's point of focus. It can be adjusted in 20 steps (-: Forward / +: Backward). You may set the same adjustment amount to be applied to all of your lenses, or an adjustment can be set individually for any particular lens. Adjustments for up to 20 lenses can be registered in the camera. Unfortunately, this new feature is only available in our newer camera models (currently the EOS 1D Mark III and EOS 1Ds Mark III). SAY WHAT? "various things can happen to a lens from the time it is manufactured, and the time it reaches a dealer or customer" What the hell is going on here? Do they employ monkeys to package and ship their products to store? Even if they did, I would expect any lens of this caliber to hold up to some abuse. Canon needs to clean up their act and do something about their apparent lack of quality control. I have a 70-200 2.8 L IS that I assume is a "good" copy since I haven't seen anything to the contrary but I'm having second thoughts about getting a Canon 24-70 or any other L lens

See above