 |
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Nov 19, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Shrapness, Image Stabilizer
|
|
Cons:
|
The IS eats battery's, weight, lens hood could be better.(scratchable)
f4,5/5,6
|
|
|
This is my favorite lens for zoo photography. I mount the camera and lens on a ball head equipped tripod. Keeping the ball head loose I can follow the animal as it walks around in its enclosure. When the animal holds still for a moment, I fire the shutter. The tripod/ballhead and image stabilization feature of this lens allow me to capture sharp images at much lower shutter speeds than would be possible if I were using a regular lens on a monopod.
if you have a strong arm, you can take @400mm at 1/30 shutter,(only for the lucky one's;-)a good picture...
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 20, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,219.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Got the lens for 2 weeks now,great on f2.8 even when the night starts
to fall.
|
|
Cons:
|
Heavy,and the price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
