 |
Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF]
|
|
Review Date: Jul 8, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast. Quick.
|
|
Cons:
|
hunts in low light.
|
|
I just bought mine to use with my new Canon 400D, just as everyone recommended. However, the IQ of mine doesn't seem cracking like the images that i have seen taken. I'm not sure if it's my 400D or my copy of the 17-50mm.
I like that it's fast, but it seems to hunt very often, compared to normal USM lenses. Not too sure if i'm supposed to take it back and change it or i have wrong expectations after reading all the fantastic reviews here.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/9799874@N05/
can anyone take a look and tell me?
|
|
|
|
|
Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF]
|
|
Review Date: Jul 8, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast.
|
|
Cons:
|
Noisy. Hunts in low light
|
|
I just bought my pair of Tamron 17-50, after reading all the wonderful reviews. However, i'm not sure whether my copy is poor or the IQ is already at its best with my results. I had the impression that it would be sharper than what i got.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/9799874@N05/
Can anyone take a look and comment?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
