Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM
|
|
Review Date: Nov 22, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $399.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Great lens. It's light, fast and well built.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
All I can say is "WOW". This is a great lens. I an very happy with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24mm f/2.8
|
|
Review Date: Nov 22, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $300.00
| Rating: 7
|
|
Pros:
|
Light, sharp, cheap.
|
|
Cons:
|
Hunts in low light.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
|
|
Review Date: Nov 22, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $750.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Great wide lens. Produces great color and it's sharp.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 26, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $480.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
This lens worked well on my 20D. IS is great and improved compared to my 28-135 IS. I used it in Zion all weekend and had some great landscape shoots. Very sharp for a consumer lens
|
|
Cons:
|
Focus hunts in low light. When zoomed out and tilted up the barrel dropes back in to the lens either when focusing or snapping the picture.
|
|
|
I was looking for a low price long lens. I feel that this is what I received. The lose barrel is a problem. It is sharp and produces decent color. I can not say enough about the IS. It really works great and you can see it and feel it working. I can hand hold it and zoom out with out worry. The lens is a little noisy but I can live with that also. I can honestly say I recommend this lens to the consumer level photographer.
|
|
|
|
|
