Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM
|
|
Review Date: Dec 9, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $890.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Resolution, fit and finish, ergonomics
|
|
Cons:
|
Hood is hard to deploy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM
|
|
Review Date: Jun 7, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $400.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Fit and finish, price
|
|
Cons:
|
So-so towards the edges below f/5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 16, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $340.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, great feel, perfect focus with 5D
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye
|
|
Review Date: Aug 8, 2006
|
Recommend? |
Price paid: $550.00
|
|
Pros:
|
Use for panoramas
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
Since posting my original review, below, I have used this lens a fair amount to make QuickTime Virtual Reality 360 x 180 degree panoramas, with considerable success.
Go here http://pindelski.org/Photography/ and click on 'Panoramas' in the left hand column to learn more.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
|
|
Review Date: Jun 9, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $675.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Optics, build.
|
|
Cons:
|
Detachable lens hood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye
|
|
Review Date: Jun 3, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $550.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharper than the 14mm 'L'
|
|
Cons:
|
Got to use ImageAlign or similar if you want rectilinear rendition
|
|
Read here http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=151 for my preliminary impressions. My desire was for an affordable hyper-wide, not for a fisheye.
|
|
|
|
|
