 |
Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Sep 11, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Stunning images, not too heavy, built in hood, great value, sharp & vibrant colours
|
|
Cons:
|
None; apart from I'm hooked on L primes!
|
|
|
This is my second L prime and I am bitten by the L prime bug. The best thing about this lens is it encourages you to be creative. The results are very rewarding.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 24, 2006
|
Recommend? |
Price paid: Not Indicated
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality
|
|
Cons:
|
Poor calibration. SOFT, SOFT, SOFT
New rating 3
|
|
|
My second replacement copy was as bad as the first. I'm off to buy a 135 f2 L. Shame, I did want the convienience of the 24-70.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 18, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Feel, Weight! 2.8 brightness
|
|
Cons:
|
Lousy calibration
|
|
|
This is my first review. Having used film for 30 years and digital compact for 5, I have been waiting for some time to go DSLR. Due to my budget I could go 5D but lenses need to be good or 30D and some L glass lenses. I decided for the latter and start with a 24-70 2.8L. Having read all the reviews on this lens I felt there was a chance I wouldn't get a sharp copy. I figured it was worth the risk and bought the 30D and the 24-70 together.
The 30D impressed instantly with feel and weight. The lens did too and I found it pleasantly weighted. Together they are very well balanced. I took about 100 test shots of varying conditions and when I looked at the very clear screen, they nearly all looked soft. The colours and contrast were good as was light capturing but did not look any different to a kit lens. No 'Wow' factor.
After loading the software and downloading I realised I had a poorly calibrated lens. The colour and contrast were brilliant but every shot was soft. So I am sending it back for another gamble of a replacement. If I don't get a sharp copy by the third I will go with primes.
I hope Canon read these reviews and do something about their internal quality control and calibration, it is really irritating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |