 |
Canon EF 35mm f/2
|
|
Review Date: Mar 7, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $220.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
small, light, sharp, nice focal length on 1.6 crop and full frame
|
|
Cons:
|
not much, I don't mind the AF noise at all. I hardly notice it. I do wish it had full time manual
|
|
|
This is a very nice small lens, that I really like for indoor pictures under low light. The focal length is great on a 1.6 crop camera. I like it quite a bit better than a 50mm prime.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
|
|
Review Date: Nov 25, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $325.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast autofocus, great IQ, great in low light, very sharp from f/2.0
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
This is a very nice lens at a very reasonable price. With its fast focus and wide aperture it is easy to use even in low light. A stellar performer and an excellent value.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Nov 11, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $900.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Excellent build, sharp, great color, everything you could want in a zoom except a 2.8 aperture.
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
This lens has been fantastic to use. I have used it for about a month now and I have no complaints whatsoever. A fabulous lens.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
|
|
Review Date: May 11, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $590.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Wonderful wide angle coverage; USM; Good color and contrast; low distortion
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
I have really enjoyed using this lens. The pictures are sharp and the wide angle perspective is wonderful for landscapes and architectural work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
