Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Apr 8, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $900.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
|
I was one of the few bashing this lens. Never thought that I would pay $900 for an EF-S lens. I gave it a try and I'm more than happy that I did it. The 24-105mm is a good lens, but this is better. Color, contrast and sharpness are amazing. I have to mention that the lens was sent to Canon for softness at 17mm wide open. I was told that it has some focusing problems.
Give it a try! The most that you can lose, if you don't like it, is the shipping. Even if you rent a lens you pay more per day that the shipping would cost you.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 18, 2007
|
Recommend? |
Price paid: $890.00
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharpness, color, build quality. I love almost everything about this lens
|
|
Cons:
|
No f/1.2. :)
Doesn't go below 10mm and above 500.
It is not pink.
Ops, I already knew all this when I bought the lens so no surprise here.
|
|
|
nt
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 9, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
|
This is the lens that I use the most. The perfect walkaround lens.
|
|
|
|
|
