 |
Canon EF 35mm f/2
|
|
Review Date: Aug 27, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $300.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
very sharp - even at open aperture, superb contrast, superb and natural colors, fast enough for an non-usm lens, cheap, nice bookeh, great normal lense on a 10D/D60/D30 - for me a better view angle as the 2,8/28, f/2
|
|
Cons:
|
Non USM? - I am happy about that - I can get a great lens for really small money :-)
|
|
|
I like to take this lens as normal lens - it gives me the opportunity to take great pictures - even if there is bad light, its my favorite lens for taking only cam+lens with me.
I am so happy to get a great image quality for this low price, and the build quality is o.k. for this price range.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 27, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $650.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
very sharp, superb contrast, natural colors, light weight, fast AF, superb build quality, very good price (germany), 1,5m distance i.o. 1,8 at the 2,8 80-200 L used before
|
|
Cons:
|
sometimes I would like to have a zoom, no other negatives..
|
|
|
One of my favorite lenses - only the zoom I am sometimes missing (I used the 80-200 before).
I thought the 2,8/80-200 L has a superb image quality (and it has), but after buying the 2,8/200 L I really know the advantages of this prime - it is not only superb in sharpness, it also gives me pictures with superb contrast and very nice and natural colors - great!
No curves in PS needed any longer :-)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
