about | support
home
 


  Reviews by: PrecisionPhoto  

View profile View recent posts View reviews Add PrecisionPhoto to your Buddy List
Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* SEL2470Z

Screen_Shot_2013-11-13_at_2_25_05_PM_copy
Review Date: Aug 31, 2014 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,350.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Sharpness and resolution, build quality, black
Cons:
A little heavy, but that's fine with all the great glass

Wow, this my's well be 4 prime lenses in one, sharpness and resolution, build quality all top notch, fast focus and colors are Zeiss quality.
Forget the new Canon 24-70 II, this kicks it's ass


 
Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 OSS SEL70200G

Sony-FE-70-200mm-f4-G-OSS
Review Date: Aug 31, 2014 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,350.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Light weight, quality made, excellent optics native lens on the A7
Cons:
none

I love this lens, the photo's that come from it remind me of the Canon 200 1.8 prime from the past I had and that saying a lot.

Fast focusing and love that it's a native lens on my Sony A7


 
Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 EX DG HSM

120_300_1_
Review Date: Mar 25, 2008 Recommend? no | Price paid: Not Indicated | Rating: 4 

 
Pros: Can't think of any
Cons:
Don't like the coating on the lens Stiff focus ring Back focused on the 1DII

I found the lens over priced and had back focus issues
and the coating on the body was inferior to Canon's


 
Tamron 28-75MM F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)

2875mm
Review Date: Mar 2, 2008 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $339.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Small, Light, Sharper then Canon, Less expensive
Cons:
Not really. but just a bit more mm on both ends would be nice

I've had Tamron in the past when I did film and trust there lenses.


After switching to Canon I had both the Canon 24-70 and 24-105 and the Tamron 28-75 beats them both with first hand real world test I performed on them all.


Color is equal, contrast from the tammy was better, sharpness, the Tamron won by just a bit.


AF from the Tamron is just a hair under the speed of the Canon's and is accurate in low light.


The Tamron was a bit soft wide open @ 2.8 but any smaller it was killer sharp.


If you need weather sealing and IS then you know your choices.


But if your after IQ the Tamron 28-75mm is King and well built too.


The newer generation of lenses in the world of 3rd party are now equal or surpass Canon.


I'm very much a Canon red ring, L nut but this Tamron 28-75 stands out as a winner for Tamron similar to the Cinderella story.