 |
Nikon 200-400mm f/4G IF-ED VR AF-S
|
|
Review Date: Nov 22, 2009
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: $5,500.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Zoom, good Details
|
|
Cons:
|
VR without good performance,
too long,
should beginn at 100 mm,
AF not really fast,
not really sharp at f:4,0
not very brillant before f: 8
Price much to high,
|
|
|
Three years with it, enough!
Olympus 2,8/90-250 mm is far better, even with 1,4x and 2x Converters.
Nikon has no really good Zoom behind 24-70 mm!
Nikon is great with the 4,0/500 mm and 4,0/600 mm,
but this Zoom is not good enough, I' ve worked with three different, none comes close to a fast prime!
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 AF APO DG OS
|
|
Review Date: Aug 26, 2008
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
good built, very good OS
|
|
Cons:
|
slowly AF, not precise, nor on Nikon, nor on Canon; OS is strange noise; to heavy; dont like the surface
|
|
|
I tested the 150-500 against Sigma OS 120-400 and Canon 100-400 IS.
I choose the Sigma OS 120-400. It is far better then the others.
But Canon has no AF trobles and f his focus is much faster.
Wondering why these are no EX-Lenses.
The 150-500 ist good until 300 mm. But therefore its to heavy and large.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
