about | support
home
 


  Reviews by: LB31291  

View profile View recent posts View reviews Add LB31291 to your Buddy List
Nikon 18-70 f/3.5-4.5G AFS DX

DX-18-70_L
Review Date: Sep 18, 2006 Recommend? no | Price paid: Not Indicated | Rating: 4 

 
Pros: Good Nikon glass.
Cons:
I have to BLAST Nikon on this - they are really making CHEAP lenses. The glass is nice, I understand that. However, the lenses they are making (18-55, 18-70, 18-135) for the D80 and others are cheap plastic garbage. It is highly insulting as a consumer paying Nikons top dollar to get platic mounts and a K-Mart feel to the lens. My very inexpensive Quantaray feels like a tank compared to these lenses. I do not care how lightweight they are, they should be build with metal mounts at a minimum. It is sad to see Sigma, Tamron and Quantaray lenses that I would rather own than a Nikon. NIKON - start putting some pride back into your manufacturing of lenses PLEASE.

See the CONS.

Nikon dropped the ball on this and many more of their newer DX lenses.


 
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

ef17-40_4l_1_
Review Date: Aug 30, 2005 Recommend? no | Price paid: $689.00 | Rating: 4 

 
Pros: Desirable range, fast and quiet focus, built well.
Cons:
Expensive, poor quality given expectations and rants about it.

Expensive, dark pictures not as clear or as good as my $199 Quantaray 28-200. You all may think I am crazy, but I have tested my Quantaray against this $$$ lens over and over and the Quantaray takes better, sharper pics close up. The Canon is equal to slightly better at greater distances. Overall the Canon is a HUGE disappointment for an "L" lens I have heard so much about. I think I may swap for the Tamron 18-75 XR. I have yet to see that lens produce a lousy photo.