 |
Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF-S
|
|
Review Date: Jan 28, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $2,150.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Very sharp at all apertures and focal lenhgt
|
|
Cons:
|
You have to be very careful with front lens element
|
|
|
Several month ago I'm switched from Canon to Nikon. I was shocked, when I first time tried this lens. It is huge difference between Canon 16-35 f2,8II and Nikon 14-24 f2,8 lenses.No doubt, it is the best UWA zoom lens in the world!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon 85mm f/1.4D IF AF Nikkor
|
|
Review Date: Jan 28, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,300.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp from wide open,pleasant bokeh, accurate AF
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
Excellent lens for portraiture
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S Nikkor
|
|
Review Date: Jan 28, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $400.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, very sharp wide open,good contrast, lightweight, inexpencive
|
|
Cons:
|
little too slow and sometimes hunting AF in low light on D3, some CA, nervous bokeh in some situations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM
|
|
Review Date: Nov 25, 2009
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: $1,400.00
| Rating: 2
|
|
Pros:
|
Image quality (if you can focus) pleasant bokeh, fast aperture
|
|
Cons:
|
Focus shift phenomenon, CA, overpriced
|
|
|
Stay away from this lens. More than two years, people reporting about focusing problems of this lens, and Canon do nothing to solve this "Focus shift" phenomenon, and still selling this lens for crazy price.
I'm was satisfied of the results, only when using live view manual focusing with designated aperture, but it is stupid to pay these money, for AF lens which you can not use auto focus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
