 |
Tokina AT-X 165 PRO DX
|
|
Review Date: Jan 25, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
High image quality even wide open. Quick auto focus with nice manual override. Constant f2.8 in a rugged body. New price is midway between the Canon and Tamron alternatives.
|
|
Cons:
|
None really, as long as 2.8 is fast enough for conditions.
|
|
|
I have used this lens on 40D and 50D with great results for about 18 months. I watch out for camera tilt when taking people pictures at 16mm, but that is not a lens problem.
The colors and contrast are excellent. I rented a Canon 17-55 before I got this lens and it may have had a little higher image quality, but this one beats it for build and price. It is a little heavier, but not a whole lot. The finish on it will look good for many years, based on my experience with other Tokina lenses.
|
|
|
|
|
Tokina AT-X 280 AF PRO 28-80mm f/2.8
|
|
Review Date: Aug 7, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharpness excellent. Flare well controlled. Autofocus speed adequate. Contrast and color excellent. Price for performance top notch.
|
|
Cons:
|
Heavy. Canon 24-70 f2.8 is faster focusing, slightly sharper and better contrast, but about same weight and 3 times the cost.
|
|
|
This has been my normal lens for 4 years on Canon A2, 10D and 20D bodies. I have thought of other lenses at various times and rented a Canon 24-70 for a wedding. I still like this lens a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
