 |
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
|
|
Review Date: Jan 24, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 18-125mm F3.5-5.6 DC
|
|
Review Date: Jan 15, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
|
|
Review Date: Jan 15, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Jan 15, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 18, 2005
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 3
|
|
Pros:
|
USM , IS , range on a FF camera.
|
|
Cons:
|
Soft, slow, PF, 28mm is not wide enough on a 1.6 sensor, no hood. Only 1 year warranty
|
|
|
Even with IS that lens is still soft at F8. Since I already had a wide angle lens, I was going to get this lens instead of the 17-85. But after testing the lens, I found it way too soft.
The Sigma 18-125 I had was sharper and of course, cheaper.
Now I just hope that the new 24-105 USM IS will be sharper than this one.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4-5.6 IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 29, 2005
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 2
|
|
Pros:
|
USM , IS, Range
|
|
Cons:
|
Soft, price, CA, Barrel distortion, F4 Wide open. Where is the hood ?
|
|
|
I tried a few copies of this lens (friends, store). USM is fast and IS can be fun but that lens is way too expensive for the pictures will get from.
And all of you who rated this lens 10/10 , can you tell me what rate you would give to a L lens ??? 15/10 ?
I understand that some people love this lens, but it cant deserve a 10/10.
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 EX DC
|
|
Review Date: Jul 29, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $500.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Hood, F2.8 , sharp, nice colors, size, warranty and the price :)
|
|
Cons:
|
No HSM , no FTMF. Short range, would have prefer a 18-70.
|
|
|
I was looking for a wide angle zoom and the 17-40L was too short. Someone suggested me to try this lens, and since then , its almost always on my camera.
Of course its not as fast as a 17-40L but its not the same price ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
