about | support
home
 


  Reviews by: JMShort  

View profile View recent posts View reviews Visit Homepage Add JMShort to your Buddy List
Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 EX DG HSM

120_300_1_
Review Date: Jan 26, 2006 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,999.00 | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: Zoom range in a 2.8. Price/value
Cons:
AF just not up to snuff. Poorly designed tripod collars.

I've owned this lens for about 9 months now and it is a lot of quality lens for the money. But, I find the autofocus is just a bit too slow for a lot of the sports I shoot. Also, after some dissappointing results on my 20D, I now only use this lens on my 1DmlII as it seems only the Series 1 autofocus has the tolerances to get constistant results. I was hoping to take advantage of the 1.6 crop factor on the 20D to get more telephoto out of this lens, but my 20D gives far too many soft focus results, even when my subjects were not in motion. Recently, shooting football in a poorly-lit dome, this lens on the 1DmlII did OK, but still missed on the focus all too often. I also talked with a colleague who shoots significantly more sports than I who abandonned this lens (for the big Canon 2.8 glass) after trying several copies of this lens, finding the focus just too slow.

Also, I am dissappointed with the strength of the TS-41 tripod collar, purchased for an additional $150. It really is a required accessory with this lens, even for hand-held use, as it is the only way to attach a strap to this lens. I broke the first TS-41 I bought for this lens while lifting the lens out of my camera backpack. The collar, unlike those supplied on big Canon glass, is not strong enough to rely on as a carrying handle. I'd think for the price on this collar, it could be built just a bit stronger.

My recommendation on this lens is to be cautious about its focussing limitations when considering it.


 
Tamron 28-105MM F/2.8 LD Aspherical (IF)

28105mm_1_
Review Date: Mar 2, 2005 Recommend? no | Price paid: $800.00 | Rating: 5 

 
Pros: The zoom range is nice. I found it to be ok optically, but not spectacular.
Cons:
Very slow auto-focus. A structurally week construction. Too expensive for the quality.

I bought this lens back in 1996 or 1997 I believe. It is a very large lens and very weakly designed for the amount of extention when it zooms to the longer focal lengths. I had to send this lens in for structural repairs several times, as did a colleague. The auto focus is way to slow for any kind of action. It was a lot to carry around and it did not stand up to the rigors of day-to-day photojournalism. I replaced it a few years back and it needs some sort of upgrade as it will not work on any of my 3 dslr bodies: It causes a err99 message without fail. Then again, I bought it 8 or 9 years ago.