 |
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
|
|
Review Date: Aug 16, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $60.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
All around great lens, performs on par. PRICE.
|
|
Cons:
|
Cheapness.
|
|
|
It does feel cheap, but the crisp pictures and awesome bokeh are unbelievable. Its insane what this 70$ lens can do.....
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS Rebel (300D)
|
|
Review Date: Aug 12, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $750.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Lightwieght, Same capabilities as 10D, Good starter camera
|
|
Cons:
|
Nothing, considering the cost
|
|
|
I purchased this camera as my first DSLR and I love it. What makes this camera better is the firmware hack for it, it gives it the same features as the 10D. Only exception is the AISERVO mode is still funny out of sports mode. The 6.3 MP is great too.
Word of advice, always check for dead pixels.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 10, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $190.00
| Rating: 4
|
|
Pros:
|
Cheap, Light (but that adds to the cheapness)
|
|
Cons:
|
Chromatic Aberration, Soft 200-300mm.
|
|
|
This lens is a sub-par lens, but can be used for a few things. Its soft from 200-300mm, at 75-200 the lens if fairly sharp for the money. Be careful of the purple fringes in metallic and white objects, ruins pictures...
I would reccomend this lens for someone who isnt so seroius about shooting and just needs a zoom.
Justin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
