Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 18, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Good performance
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
Much better than the 'old' 16-35mm. But be careful! I have to test 4 samples before I had a good one. The other were worse the Mark1.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 18, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, bokeh, contrast
|
|
Cons:
|
Maybe price
|
|
|
I had before the 85mm F1.2 Mark1 on a 1DsII. Everything is a little better with this lens.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 18, 2007
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality, F1.2
|
|
Cons:
|
Price!!!
|
|
|
Immediately after using the first time this lens (which I bought in Holland at KameraExpress) I saw that this isn’t what I expected. I have 35L, 85LII and the 135L in combination with the 1DsII.
The lens still even have a lot of CA at f8. I went with the lens to service of Canon. After repairing it was a lot better but still much more CA then all other (zoom) lenses I have, including the cheap Sigma 50mm macro. You can see the CA at F1.2 but also at F8
I thing I have a very sample but after 2 weeks I am still waiting for a solution from the shop.
|
|
|
|
|
