about | support
home
 


  Reviews by: Erwin Foo  

View profile View recent posts View reviews Add Erwin Foo to your Buddy List
Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM

l217_efs1755
Review Date: Nov 4, 2007 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $850.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Focus very fast and quitely, IS, Sharp, High Image quality
Cons:
Heavy, Dark corner at f/2.8

The focus is very fast and quiet! You will be amazed by the image quality that produced by this lens.

I owned a Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 as well, I still prefer to use this lens.

However, please beware of the dark corner when you shoot at f/2.8. Especially when the blue sky is your photo's background.

This is an excellent lens and I highly recommend it.

Some sample for your reference:

http://www.pbase.com/erwinfoo/image/87605693

http://www.pbase.com/erwinfoo/image/88069347

http://www.pbase.com/erwinfoo/image/88345178



 
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

ef70-200lisusm
Review Date: Aug 5, 2007 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,070.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Sharpness, IS, Focus very fast, quiet and accurate.
Cons:
No

After I bought this lens, I was immediately shocked by it's sharpness. The Image quality and the richness of the color is very good.

I tried on my Canon 400D, the focus speed is fast, quiet and accurate.

This is a great lens!

Some Sample:

http://www.pbase.com/erwinfoo/image/83378770
http://www.pbase.com/erwinfoo/image/83378771
http://www.pbase.com/erwinfoo/image/83378774



 
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

70-300_isusm
Review Date: May 3, 2007 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $550.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: IS, affortable price, Sharpness, Image quality
Cons:

The IS is excellent!

I am quite happy with the images quality, the sharpness is good as well. I know this can't compete with the L lenses, but still a very good lens to have.

I am glad to have this lens and highly recommend it.


Sample:
http://www.pbase.com/erwinfoo/kowloon_park