 |
Canon EOS Rebel XTi (400D)
|
|
Review Date: Nov 1, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $800.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Better AF,extra 2MP from it's predecessor,better buffer,LCD screen and dust reduction.
|
|
Cons:
|
Plastic feeling(as all xxxD series).Not great comfort without the grip(in my opinion necessary).
|
|
|
I sold the 10D and bought the 400D.It is lighter but feels plastic.I think that it is a very good camera for the money.It has the 20/30D focus system with good ISO performans.The LCD is very good and I like it.I am not much of a MP maniac but I like the extra 4MP from my 10D.It is a good choice for people who do not want to spend too much money in a body(go for glass people!!!).
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 10D
|
|
Review Date: Dec 8, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,000.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality,noise at higher ISO(compeared to camera like D70),cheap if bought used,good image quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow starter(compeared to new camera),small buffer(also compeared to new camera).
|
|
|
This is my first DSLR so I find it relatively good choice to start.It is not very expensive(used),it has very good filling and build quality.In nowdays it is a relatively slow starter and low buffer camera but still takes good picture and it's good enought for me,for now.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 29, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Focus speed,sharp at even f4,lightweight,build quality
|
|
Cons:
|
Limited by f4(IS with extra 200$ would have been perfect)
|
|
|
Very good lens with great contrast and colors.Sharp even wide open.The weight is good and the build quality is excellent.Focus speed is WHOOO fast in good light.
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 EX DC
|
|
Review Date: Feb 13, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $450.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast and not noisy focus,build quality,f/2.8,sharpness(even at f2.8),weight
|
|
Cons:
|
vighetting at 2.8(easy corected),warmer colors
|
|
|
I bought this lens 3 months ago.I am a really happy for the $$$ that I paid for this very good lens.I had very good samples with this lens.If I had the $$$ I would have gone for the Canon 16-35L f/2.8(2.8 is important for me).
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8
|
|
Review Date: Nov 29, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $65.00
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Very light,low cost prime,with very good performance for the price
|
|
Cons:
|
Plastic mount,no distance indicator(MkII)
|
|
|
I have the MkII which is great for the money.It is light and with f/1.8 very usable.Excellent value for money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
