 |
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 4, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Wide, sharp and light.
|
|
Cons:
|
A little unsharp in the corners.
|
|
|
I'm very happy with my EF10-22 on the 20D.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4-5.6 IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 4, 2005
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 2
|
|
Pros:
|
IS, Looks and feels good
|
|
Cons:
|
Soft pictures, unpleasing bokeh, expensive
|
|
|
I really wanted to like this lens, the focal lenght is very useful for 1.6 crop, but I was so dissapointed when I started using it. I like the build of it very much, but all the pictures I took with it just lacked the crispness which I like so much - and get from my other lenses.
I sold mine after a few months, and got a used 24-70L
One could only dream of a crisp and clear 17-85 f/2.8L IS USM...
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM
|
|
Review Date: Jun 27, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Very very sharp, low weight
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
This lens surpassed my expectations, producing sharp clear and crisp images of everything from bugs to landscapes.
Originally I had the EF100/2.8 macro in mind, but then I got in touch with a guy who wanted to trade his new EF-S 60 directly for my EF50/1.4. I have not regretted for a second, and would never trade it back!
I often use my 60mm as my walkaround lens, it's light and the performance is simply outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
