 |
Canon EF 100mm f/2 USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 13, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp, sharp and sharp
|
|
Cons:
|
could get a bit closer
|
|
|
Hi, this lens is really great. I bought it because my 70-200 2,8 IS is quite a bit heavy for business portraits at customers location. I love this lens and highly recommend it.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Jun 5, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,500.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
excellent build quality, excellent sharpness, fast focussing, great IS
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
The best lens I ever owned. With IS it is inredible. Highly recommended to everybody who has to work with available light.
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 300mm f2.8 EX APO HSM
|
|
Review Date: Mar 30, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Excellent quality, good sharpness, works good with the Canon 2x ExtenderII
|
|
Cons:
|
Missing the IS from the Canons
|
|
|
This Sigma was the only way to let my dream come true, to own a 2,8/300, because the Canon is too expensive for me.
I am really impressed by the good quality of the images. Compared with the images taken with the Canon 2,8/70-200 L IS the Sigma shots seem to be a bit warmer.
AF speed is quite ok.
The lens works fine with my Canon 2x Extender II, so I can highly recommend it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
