 |
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 18, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
build, IQ, sharpness, colour reproduction, weight, price
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
If you can get away with F4 then buy this lens. I am very impressed with it.
I use it for outdoor sport and also portraiture.
I also have the 135L if I get stuck in low light so they would well together.
This lens produces A+ quality images.
Big plus also is the feather-like weight
Highly recommend especially if you cant afford the F2.8 version
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 18, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharpness, build, colours
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
Really nice landscape lens and then doubles as a nice walk around if you have a crop body.
Some may say not quite wide enough but it works for me.
Produces high quality images
Highly recommend
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 18, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharpness, reasonable cost, build, IQ, sharpness, colours, did I say sharpness
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
Wow Wow Wow
Don't think about buying it, just do it
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG APO MACRO HSM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 18, 2008
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 4
|
|
Pros:
|
price, build, feel
|
|
Cons:
|
soft wide open
|
|
|
Sent this back for calibration numerous times and still came back soft.
I paid for f2.8, I expect to be able to use it.
Sigma need better quality control
Positive notes would be the excellent feel and build quality
It just doesn't cut the mustard for me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
