Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 EX DG HSM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 20, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,750.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
2.8 120-300 zoom lower cost than the white ones
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
I got my Ms Siggy from a known entity from this board. From the moment I shot my first shots and opended them in PS I knew I had made a great buy. It's a non dg and on my 1D for kids sports like tball it's the perfect fl. Maybe one day I'll move it own but not before I see the files from my 300/400 before I let this lens go.
|
|
|
|
|
Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF]
|
|
Review Date: Aug 1, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $400.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Great walk around for crop body
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
This lens is a real keeper. Compared to what I thought was sharp in the razr (Tamron 28-75) all I have to say is if I had to sell one the razr would have to go.
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX APO IF HSM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 26, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $625.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
2.8 is very usable
|
|
Cons:
|
none so far
|
|
|
If the white body lenses are any better than my used 03 non dg then I could charge even more for 8 x 10's. This lens is sharp and fast. I have not tried the canon 2.8 but this sig is just as sharp as my L4 same focal length. I do not mind paying more for a 2.8L but somebody is going to have a hard time getting this sig first.
|
|
|
|
|
